Contradictions and Concordances in American Colonization Models

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The traditional view of American colonization during the late Pleistocene has largely been conditioned on early conceptions of the timing and extent of continental glaciations and the age and distribution of archeological sites. A review of newer, high resolution genetic data, both from modern populations and ancient DNA samples, along with the emergence of several early archeological sites in both North and South America, and reconsiderations of the glacial dynamics in North America indicate that some aspects of the traditional view need reconsideration. It seems obvious from archeological data that a preglacial occupation of the Americas needs to be closely examined. Accumulating molecular genetic data raises new questions about the timing and population size of the initial colonization(s), while a closer examination of glacial models suggests that a number of routes into the Americas may have been available until fairly late in the last glacial cycle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Rourke, D. H. (2011, May 21). Contradictions and Concordances in American Colonization Models. Evolution: Education and Outreach. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0336-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free