The PREVASC study: The clinical effect of a multifaceted educational intervention to prevent childhood asthma

67Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood, much attention is directed towards primary prevention. Here, the clinical effectiveness of a multifaceted educational prevention was studied. A total of 476 high-risk children were recruited during the prenatal period by general practitioners and randomised to either: 1) a control group, receiving usual care; or 2) an intervention group in which families received instruction from nurses on how to reduce exposure of newborns to mite, pet and food allergens, and passive smoking. A total of 443 infants were followed-up for 2 yrs. At 2 yrs of age, the intervention group (n=222) had less asthma-like symptoms, including wheezing, shortness of breath and night-time cough, than the control group (n=221). No significant differences in total and specific immunoglobulin E were found between the groups. During the first 2 yrs of life, the incidence of asthma-like symptoms was similar in both groups; however, subanalysis revealed a significant reduction in the female, but not in the male, intervention group. In conclusion, the intervention used in this study was not effective in reducing asthma-like symptoms in high-risk children during the first 2 yrs of life, although it was modestly effective at 2 yrs. Follow-up is necessary to confirm whether the intervention can actually prevent the development of asthma. Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2005.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schönberger, H. J. A. M., Dompeling, E., Knottnerus, J. A., Maas, T., Muris, J. W. M., van Weel, C., & van Schayck, C. P. (2005). The PREVASC study: The clinical effect of a multifaceted educational intervention to prevent childhood asthma. European Respiratory Journal, 25(4), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00067704

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

20%

Researcher 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

61%

Psychology 7

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

16%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free