Constrictive pericarditis

51Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis remains a challenge because its physical findings and hemodynamics mimic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Various diagnostic advances over the years enable us to differentiate between these two conditions. This review begins with a case report of constrictive pericarditis, followed by a brief history and discussions of etiologies. Clinical features, radiologic, electrocardiographic, angiographic findings, and hemodynamics of constrictive pericarditis are reviewed. The echocardiographic findings are detailed and the recent advances in Doppler flow velocity patterns of pulmonary, mitral, tricuspid valves and hepatic veins are reported. Nuclear ventriculograms depict rapid ventricular filling in constrictive pericarditis and differentiate it from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Endomyocardial biopsy helps further in recognizing the various types of restrictive cardiomyopathies. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging delineate abnormal pericardial thickness in constrictive pericarditis. Association of characteristic hemodynamic changes and abnormal pericardial thickness > 3 mm usually confirms the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Effusive and occult varieties of constrictive pericarditis are briefly described. This review concludes with emphasizing the importance of pericardial resection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mehta, A., Mehta, M., & Jain, A. C. (1999). Constrictive pericarditis. Clinical Cardiology. Foundation for Advances in Medicine and Science Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960220509

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free