Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physicochemical properties of different brands of traditional (A, B and E), low calorie (C) and sugar-free (D) guava preserves. The results of these analysis indicated that there are differences in the physical and physicochemical properties of the different brands studied, and the partial and/or total exclusion of sugar from guava alters its physical and physicochemical properties, making the product redder; even added body and sweetening agents are incapable of conferring properties similar to those of conventional products. Regarding the relaxation test, the Maxwell model was the best for sample discrimination. The results also showed that the samples have a traditional standardization and that the sample labeled "low calorie" has a tendency to exhibit a composition similar to the conventional sample, which is evidence that brand (C) cannot be considered to be low calorie.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, P. A. P., Souza, V. R., Carneiro, J. D. S., Borges, S. V., Ferreira, L. O., & Queiroz, F. (2013). Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 30(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322013000300011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free