The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning In The Teaching of Form Four Mathematical Reasoning

  • Sam H
  • George Tan G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pembelajaran kolaboratif merujuk kepada organisasi bilik darjah di mana pelajar bekerjasama dalam kumpulan yang kecil melakukan aktiviti yang dikongsikan tetapi mempunyai matlamat yang sama. Kajian ini mengkaji keberkesanan pembelajaran kolaboratif dalam pengajaran topik “Penaakulan Matematik” tingkatan empat dan kesan jantina kepada keberkesanan kaedah pengajaran ini di sebuah sekolah menengah kerajaan Malaysia. Kajian ini juga melihat kesan jantina ke atas minat pelajar terhadap pembelajaran matematik dan persepsi kepada kaedah pengajaran. Kajian ini dijalankan menggunakan kajian berbentuk ujian pra–pasca kuasi–eksperiment dengan satu kumpulan kajian dan satu kumpulan kawalan. Kajian ini menggunakan dua kelas di sebuah sekolah menengah kerajaan di Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. Kelas kajian telah diajar menggunakan pembelajaran kolaboratif manakala kelas kawalan telah diajar menggunakan pembelajaran secara lisan. Alat ukur kajian adalah ujian pra, ujian pasca dan borang soal selidik. Keputusan kajian menunjukkan kumpulan pembelajaran kolaboratif menunjukkan keputusan yang lebih baik berbanding dengan kumpulan pembelajaran tradisional. Tambahan pula. pelajar perempuan mendapat keputusan yang lebih baik jika dibandingkan dengan pelajar lelaki dalam kedua–dua kaedah pengajaran. Majoriti pelajar juga lebih gemar pembelajaran kolaboratif dan kumpulan kolaboratif menunjukkan minat yang tinggi dalam pembelajaran matematik. Akan tetapi, keputusan menunjukkan bahawa tiada kesan jantina terhadap kaedah pengajaran, minat pelajar terhadap pembelajaran matematik dan persepsi kepada kaedah pengajaran. Kata kunci: Kolaboratif; pembelajaran kolaboratif; keberkesanan; jantina; penaakulan Matematik Collaborative learning refers to the form of classroom organization in which students work together, in small groups, on a shared activity and with a common goal. This study focused on looking at the effectiveness of collaborative learning in the teaching of form four mathematical reasoning, and the possible effects of gender on the instructional methods in a Malaysian government secondary school. This study also looked at the gender effects on interest toward learning mathematics and perceptions of the teaching methods. The study was carried out using a pretest–posttest quasi-experiment research design with one treatment group and one control group. The study used two intact classes at a government secondary school in Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. The treatment class was taught using collaborative learning while the control class was taught using lecture–based instruction. The research instruments used in the study to collect data consisted of a pretest, posttest and questionnaire. The result showed that the collaborative learning group outperformed the traditional instructional group. In addition, female students obtained better results compared to male students in both of the instructional method. Majority of the students also preferred collaborative learning and collaborative learning group also showed higher interest in learning mathematics. However, the result showed that there were no gender effects on the instructional methods, interest toward learning mathematics and perceptions of the teaching methods. Key words: Collaborative; collaborative learning; effectiveness; gender; mathematical reasoning

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sam, H. K., & George Tan, G. S. (2011). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning In The Teaching of Form Four Mathematical Reasoning. Jurnal Teknologi. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v55.81

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

50%

Materials Science 1

17%

Physics and Astronomy 1

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free