Stenting for emergency colorectal obstruction: An analysis of 204 patients in relation to predictors of failure and complications

12Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Self-expanding metallic stents are increasingly used in the management of malignant and benign colorectal obstructions. We aimed to identify relevant predictive factors for stent failure and stent-related complications. Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of 204 consecutive patients who underwent emergency colorectal stenting procedures because of symptomatic bowel obstructions from 1996 to 2011 at the Sisters of Charity Hospital Linz, Austria. Results: A total of 204 patients (median age 74 years) with 36 (17.7%) benign and 168 (82.3%) malignant obstructions were included in the study. Technical success was achieved in 92.5% and clinical success in 86.8% of the cases. Major complications occurred in 2.9% and minor ones in 19.6%. Overall mortality during a median follow-up period of 4.3 years was 73% (149 patients). Relevant predictors of increased risk of complications were extracolonic obstruction (p = 0.001), complete obstruction (p = 0.066), and inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.05). Stent localization at the splenic flexure, a stenosis of >8 cm in length, and the need for endoscopic guidance were associated with higher rates of technical and/or clinical stenting failure. Conclusion: Colorectal stenting is less invasive than other means of emergency treatment for large bowel obstruction; it is generally safe and effective in different types of colorectal obstruction. However, relevant rates of failure and complications were recorded and predictors could be determined.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Köhler, G., Antoniou, S. A., Lechner, M., Mayer, F., Mair, J., & Emmanuel, K. (2015). Stenting for emergency colorectal obstruction: An analysis of 204 patients in relation to predictors of failure and complications. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 104(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496914552342

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free