Israel-Palestine: The Mediterranean Paradox

  • Azhar H
  • Pinfari M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict provides, in theory, good grounds for encouraging regional integration as a strategy for conflict transformation: the conflict is regional in nature, and Europe’s geographical proximity and past colonial involvement make the European Union (EU) a useful framework for the region to emulate. Moreover, instability in the region and the interests of key regional stakeholders in the conflict also lend credence to the integration-peace strategy. However, the EU has not pursued a tangible regional integration strategy to help transform the conflict. Instead, the intentional and unintentional use of certain pathways of influence indicates the EU’s growing reliance on its neo-functionalist approach towards conflict transformation. This has included a subdued but consistent promotion of regional cooperation to foster dialogue and civil society cooperation between both sides and other regional actors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azhar, H., & Pinfari, M. (2017). Israel-Palestine: The Mediterranean Paradox. In The EU, Promoting Regional Integration, and Conflict Resolution (pp. 57–80). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47530-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free