Government mythology on income management, alcohol, addiction and Indigenous communities

21Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many governments have intensified conditions on social security payments, implementing new paternalist and neoliberal policy ideals that individualise responsibility for overcoming poverty. This article explores how such policy ideals can operate with a racialised impact in the context of income management, a type of welfare conditionality in Australia that delivers cashless welfare transfers. Income management originally applied only to Indigenous welfare recipients, but has since been expanded. The government’s rationale for the scheme is to limit access to alcohol and other drugs, and promote ‘socially responsible behaviour’. However, empirical evidence indicates that income management in the Northern Territory has not been successful in achieving the government’s policy objectives. Income management is built upon a policy narrative of addiction – those subject to it are portrayed as addicted to welfare payments and to alcohol. This article critiques these depictions and outlines a range of pragmatic, political and ethical concerns about income management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bielefeld, S. (2018). Government mythology on income management, alcohol, addiction and Indigenous communities. Critical Social Policy, 38(4), 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317752735

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free