Impact of primary care socio-educational groups in mental health of women

4Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To present part of the results of the evaluation of this strategy. Method: Longitudinal (pre-post) and quasi-experimental (experimental and control group) design, collecting information from 228 women (114 each group) in four moments (one month before the program; one month after the end of the program; six months and a year and a half). Among the instruments used are the Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Results: Women in the experimental group reduce their symptoms of depression and anxiety and improve their self-esteem after participating in the program, and this improvement is maintained until a year and a half after the end of it. On the contrary, women in the control group do not present pre-post differences in almost none of the variables analyzed (except in anxiety symptoms). Conclusion: These results support GRUSE as a non-medical intervention, and it is considered that they can serve as a stimulus to maintain the strategy and even extend it to other population groups that also experience psychosocial discomfort.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palacios-Gálvez, M. S., Morales-Marente, E., Iáñez-Domínguez, A., & Luque-Ribelles, V. (2021). Impact of primary care socio-educational groups in mental health of women. Gaceta Sanitaria, 35(4), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.02.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free