Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs

42Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents an agent strategy for complex bilateral negotiations over many issues with inter-dependent valuations. We use ideas inspired by graph theory and probabilistic influence networks to derive efficient heuristics for negotiations about multiple issues. Experimental results show - under relatively weak assumptions with respect to the structure of the utility functions - that the developed approach leads to Pareto-efficient outcomes. Moreover, Pareto-efficiency can be reached with few negotiation steps, because we explicitly model and utilize the underlying graphical structure of complex utility functions. Consequently, our approach is applicable to domains where reaching an efficient outcome in a limited amount of time is important. Furthermore, unlike other solutions for high-dimensional negotiations, the proposed approach does not require a mediator. Copyright 2005 ACM.

References Powered by Scopus

Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents

997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations

533Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments

275Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From problems to protocols: Towards a negotiation handbook

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A decentralized model for automated multi-attribute negotiations with incomplete information and general utility functions

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robu, V., Somefun, D. J. A., & La Poutré, J. A. (2005). Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 423–430). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.744024

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

73%

Researcher 4

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 23

77%

Engineering 3

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

10%

Energy 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0