Vitamin D and attainment of peak bone mass among peripubertal Finnish girls: A 3-y prospective study

271Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the effect of vitamin D status on bone gain in adolescents. Objective: The objective was to examine whether vitamin D status is associated with accrual of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD). Design: This 3-y prospective study examined the association between changes in BMD or BMAD and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in 171 healthy Finnish girls aged 9-15 y. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMDs BMI)s were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Results: Baseline 25(OH)D correlated significantly with the unadjusted 3-y change in BMD at the lumbar spine (r = 0.35, P < 0.001) and femoral neck (r = 0.32, P < 0.001) in all participants. The difference from baseline in adjusted 3-y BMD accumulation between those with severe hypovitaminosis D [25(OH)D < 20 nmol/L] and those with a normal vitamin D status [25(OH)D ≥ 37.5 nmol/L] was 4% (12.7%, 13.1%, and 16.7% for the lowest, middle, and highest tertiles of 25(OH)D, respectively; P for trend = 0.01) at the lumbar spine in the girls with advanced sexual maturation at baseline (n = 129). Moreover, the adjusted change in lumbar spine BMD was 27% greater in the highest vitamin D intake tertile than in the lowest tertile in the same girls (P for trend = 0.016). Conclusions: Pubertal girls with hypovitaminosis D seem to be at risk of not reaching maximum peak bone mass, particularly at the lumbar spine. Dietary enrichment or supplementation with vitamin D should be considered to ensure an adequate vitamin D status.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lehtonen-Veromaa, M. K. M., Möttönen, T. T., Nuotio, I. O., Irjala, K. M. A., Leino, A. E., & Viikari, J. S. A. (2002). Vitamin D and attainment of peak bone mass among peripubertal Finnish girls: A 3-y prospective study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76(6), 1446–1453. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free