How much true structure has been discovered?Validating explorative clustering on a hold-out test set

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Comparing clustering algorithms is much more difficult than comparing classification algorithms, which is due to the unsupervised nature of the task and the lack of a precisely stated objective. We consider explorative cluster analysis as a predictive task (predict regions where data lumps together) and propose a measure to evaluate the performance on an hold-out test set. The performance is discussed for typical situations and results on artificial and real world datasets are presented for partitional, hierarchical, and density-based clustering algorithms. The proposed S-measure successfully senses the individual strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Höppner, F. (2009). How much true structure has been discovered?Validating explorative clustering on a hold-out test set. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5632 LNAI, pp. 385–397). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03070-3_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free