There is no phonology without abstract categories: A commentary on Ambridge (2020)

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ambridge’s proposal cannot account for the most basic observations about phonological patterns in human languages. Outside of the earliest stages of phonological production by toddlers, the phonological systems of speakers/learners exhibit internal behaviours that point to the representation and processing of inter-related units ranging in size from sub-segmental (featural) and segmental to larger prosodic units ranging from the syllable all the way to the phonological utterance. Only theories which embrace these units can make proper predictions about phonological behaviours.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rose, Y. (2020). There is no phonology without abstract categories: A commentary on Ambridge (2020). First Language, 40(5–6), 626–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723720905908

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free