Challenge and threat motivation: effects on superficial and elaborative information processing

  • Fonseca R
  • Blascovich J
  • Garcia-Marques T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper integrates the motivational states of challenge and threat within a dual processing perspective. Previous research has demonstrated that individuals experience a challenge state when individuals have sufficient resources to cope with the demands of a task (Blascovich et al., 1993). Because the experience of resource availability has been shown to be associated with superficial processing (Garcia-Marques and Mackie, 2007), we tested the hypothesis that challenge is associated with superficial processing in two persuasion experiments. Experiment 1 revealed that inducing attitudes of participants in a challenge state was not sensitive to the quality of arguments presented. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the effect occurs even when task engagement, manipulated by the presence (vs. the absence) of a task observer (Blascovich et al., 1993), is high. The implications of these results for the biopsychosocial model model and the cognitive and motivational literature are discussed.

Figures

  • FIGURE 1 | Index of attitude change toward the target issue as a function of demands and message quality. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
  • FIGURE 2 | Index of attitude change toward the target issue as a function of motivational state and argument strength for the presence condition.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fonseca, R., Blascovich, J., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2014). Challenge and threat motivation: effects on superficial and elaborative information processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01170

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

74%

Researcher 6

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 35

78%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

11%

Sports and Recreations 3

7%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0