TEO-DEMOKRASI BERBASIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN: STUDI KOMPARATIF ATAS RESPONS S.M. ZAFAR DAN MEHDI BAZARGAN TENTANG SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM

  • Suharto T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article seeks to examine and analyze how the response of two contemporary Islamic thinkers of democracy. Both thinkers are S.M. Zafar and Mehdi Bazargan. They have typical thinking about the system of government. Zafar offers a system of government based on the Theo-democracy parliamentary, because of his opposition to the military system in Pakistan. Whiles Bazargan offers the system of government based on Theo-democracy, because of his opposition to the ‘ulamā’ system of Khomeini’s government. They are looked theo-democracy governance as a system that needs to be implemented in an Islamic state.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suharto, T. (2014). TEO-DEMOKRASI BERBASIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN: STUDI KOMPARATIF ATAS RESPONS S.M. ZAFAR DAN MEHDI BAZARGAN TENTANG SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 22(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.22.1.258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free