For societies in which racism is an operating system, whiteness is a form of currency with a significantly high exchange rate. Its value is so meaningful, George Lipsitz argues, that it produces a false group solidarity and possessive investment1 in its continuation. For many white people in the United States, whiteness has provided a pathway to opportunities for acquiring society’s transformative assets: land, housing, jobs, and education. In this way, whiteness has been a tool for social mobility and intergenerational economic security.2 Put simply, it has material benefits that can pay a high economic yield. Yet, for most white people in the United States, the real dividend of whiteness comes in its symbolic value: its deeply felt power in shaping social status, group membership, and identity. In this way, whiteness provides a well-documented identity to buy into, one that promises a placement in the social hierarchy higher than people of color. For whites, who become what Charles Mills calls "signatories" in a racial contract, they will "live in an invented delusional world, a racial fantasyland, a ‘consensual hallucination.'"3.
CITATION STYLE
Drew, E. M. (2013). Whiteness as currency: Rethinking the exchange rate. In Living With Class: Philosophical Reflections on Identity and Material Culture (pp. 101–105). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326799_11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.