Rumination and Wronging: The Role of Attention in Epistemic Morality

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The idea that our epistemic practices can be wrongful has been the core observation driving the growing literature on epistemic injustice, doxastic wronging, and moral encroachment. But, one element of our epistemic practice has been starkly absent from this discussion of epistemic morality: Attention. The goal of this article is to show that attention is a worthwhile focus for epistemology, especially for the field of epistemic morality. After presenting a new dilemma for proponents of doxastic wronging, I show how focusing on attention not only allows us to defuse that dilemma, but also helps to substantiate accounts of what goes wrong in cases of doxastic wronging.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saint-Croix, C. (2022). Rumination and Wronging: The Role of Attention in Epistemic Morality. Episteme, 19(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free