Survival outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma in France: A retrospective cohort study using the Système National des Données de Santé national healthcare database

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at different treatment stages in France. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study used data from the French National Health Insurance database to study patients with MM (diagnosis 2013–2019). Patient outcomes included OS (all-cause mortality), time-to-next treatment (TTNT), and duration of therapy (DoT) from initial diagnosis, the start of different lines of therapy (LOTs), triple-class exposure (TCE), and subsequent treatment following TCE. The Kaplan–Meier method analyzed “time-to-event” data. Results: From diagnosis, death rates increased from 1% at 1 month to 24% at 2 years; median OS was 63.8 months (N = 14 309). Median OS from the start of LOTs declined from 61.0 months (LOT1) to 14.8 months (LOT4). Median OS from TCE start was 14.7 months. There was a large variation in TTNT within LOTs (e.g., LOT1: bortezomib + lenalidomide: TTNT = 26.4 months, OS = 61.7 months; lenalidomide: TTNT = 20.0 months, OS = 39.6 months); DoT was similar for LOT1 and LOT2, then progressively declined at LOT4. Patients with stem cell transplant, younger age, and less comorbidity had better survival outcomes. Conclusions: Patients with MM face a poor prognosis after relapse to multiple LOTs and TCE, demonstrating a worsening of survival outcomes. Access to novel therapies may improve outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leleu, X., Gorsh, B., Bessou, A., Paka, P., De Nascimento, J., Colin, X., … Wang, P. F. (2023). Survival outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma in France: A retrospective cohort study using the Système National des Données de Santé national healthcare database. European Journal of Haematology, 111(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13976

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free