Realistic simulation in immunization: satisfaction, self-confidence and performance of nursing students

  • Beserra E
  • Camelo L
  • Teles L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to analyze satisfaction, self-confidence and performance of nursing students in realistic immunization simulation. Methods: quasi-experimental study, using the Immunization Checklist and Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning Scale, with 72 students, divided into Group 1 (38 seventh semester students who have not yet been in the field of practice in the Child Health discipline) and Group 2 (34 ninth semester students). Results: there was no difference between groups in terms of immunization performance (t-test: 1.701; p=0.096), as well as in terms of the degree of performance (Likelihood Ratio: 1.939; p=0.164). There was a significant difference when assessing satisfaction and self-confidence in learning (t-test: 2.346; p=0.023). Conclusion: the previous practice of immunization in the field of practice did not influence the performance of nursing students during the realistic simulation, but it did interfere with satisfaction and self-confidence in learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beserra, E. P., Camelo, L. B. M., Teles, L. M. R., Barbosa, J. E. C., Cavalcante, V. M. V., Gubert, F. do A., & Martins, M. C. (2020). Realistic simulation in immunization: satisfaction, self-confidence and performance of nursing students. Rev Rene, 21, e44514. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202144514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free