Comparison of Cut-to-Length Harvesting Methods in Tree Plantations in Brazil

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the most productive tree-cutting methods, and the factors influencing them, in flat and sloping terrains in tree plantations in Brazil. The study utilized drone-captured video material from harvesting operations in eucalyptus and pine plantations. In both terrains, two cutting methods were compared, differing in the felling to the side method used: either at the edge or inside of the harvesting front. In addition, on flat terrain, the efficiency of forward felling was studied in relation to the aforementioned cutting methods. In sloping terrain, the machines were also equipped with a winch assistance system. The time study data of the harvesting work were processed using a video analysis tool developed for the research. The output data of the cut trees were collected with the automatic measuring system of the harvester. Statistical tests were used to determine the most productive cutting methods by analyzing differences in productivity. With an average tree size of 0.3 m3, cutting productivity was 45 m3/E0h in pine cuttings and 55 m3/E0h in eucalyptus cuttings. The average cutting productivity on flat terrain was about 11 m3/E0h higher than on sloping terrain, mainly due to the time spent attaching the winch assistance system, which was a necessary phase of the work on sloping terrain. The research results suggest that it would be most productive to use sideways felling inside the harvesting front method. However, the need for further research is evident, if we want to precisely identify the factors and work phases in the tree-cutting cycle affecting differences in the productivity of the harvesting chain in tree plantations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palander, T., Pasi, A., Laurèn, A., & Ovaskainen, H. (2024). Comparison of Cut-to-Length Harvesting Methods in Tree Plantations in Brazil. Forests, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040666

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free