Les conditions gagnantes et les défis pour une participation active des parties prenantes dans un contexte d'évaluation de programmes d'intervention psychosociale

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to optimize the appropriateness, utilization, and appropriation of an evaluation process, which is often expensive in terms of time and money, we have recently encouraged the increasingly active involvement of various stakeholders (Cousins et Chouinard, 2012). Beyond this orientation, there are important issues concerning the selection and the degree of participation of these stakeholders, as well as obstacles and conditions facilitating their participation (Hurteau, Houle et Marchand, 2012). Firstly, this article is based on the evaluation of Relais-Pères, carried out as part of participatory action research over more than ten years in order to specify the conditions and obstacles encountered in a framework of services. Secondly, attention is given to issues linked to the specifics of an evaluative approach in the interest of appropriation by partners in this approach.

References Powered by Scopus

Why Don't We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition

1492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3-Year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive–behavioral preventive interventions

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical outcomes of Joint Crisis Plans to reduce compulsory treatment for people with psychosis: A randomised controlled trial

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubeau, D., Bérubé, A., Lafantaisie, V., Coutu, S., & Turcotte, G. (2018). Les conditions gagnantes et les défis pour une participation active des parties prenantes dans un contexte d’évaluation de programmes d’intervention psychosociale. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.42203

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 2

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free