Variations in the maximum transport rates for ammonium and nitrate in the prymnesiophyte Emiliania huxleyi and the raphidophyte Heterosigma carterae

39Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Changes in the maximum rates of ammonium and nitrate transport (T(max); expressed as C-specific N transport) into Emiliania huxleyi and Heterosigma carterae were related to N status (cellular N:C). There was considerable variation in the magnitude of T(max) relative to N:C. For nitrate transport in both species and for ammonium in H. carterae, the curve linking N:C and T(max) was bell shaped; T(max) increased initially as N:C fell and then T(max) decreased. In contrast, T(max) for ammonium in E. huxleyi did not decrease to such low levels and N-specific N transport increased continually as N:C decreased. While T(max) for ammonium into E. huxleyi could be an order of magnitude higher than the N-transport rate required to support growth, for nitrate transport into both species T(max) was coupled more closely to growth rate. In H. carterae, T(max) for ammonium was up to four times that for nitrate. Relationships for ammonium and nitrate T(max) have been computed for simulations of the growth of E. huxleyi and H. carterae. The implications of these results for modelling ammonium-nitrate interactions are discussed. It is shown that attempts to obtain a relationship between T(max) and N:C from steady-state chemostat data may result in significant deviations from relationships determined using incubation techniques. Further, it is more important to obtain a good estimate for ammonium T(max) because of its dominant role in affecting the ammonium-nitrate interaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flynn, K. J., Page, S., Wood, G., & Hipkin, C. R. (1999). Variations in the maximum transport rates for ammonium and nitrate in the prymnesiophyte Emiliania huxleyi and the raphidophyte Heterosigma carterae. Journal of Plankton Research, 21(2), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/21.2.355

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free