Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study

20Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results for multiple outcomes using this approach remains uncertain. We; therefore, developed and iteratively modified a presentation method that effectively summarises NMA results of multiple outcomes for clinicians using this new interpretation approach. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Setting A steering group of seven individuals with experience in NMA and design validation studies developed two colour-coded presentation formats for evaluation. Through an iterative process, we assessed the validity of both formats to maximise their clarity and ease of interpretation. Participants 26 participants including 20 clinicians who routinely provide patient care, 3 research staff/research methodologists and 3 residents. Main outcome measures Two team members used qualitative content analysis to independently analyse transcripts of all interviews. The steering group reviewed the analyses and responded with serial modifications of the presentation format. Results To ensure that readers could easily discern the benefits and safety of each included treatment across all assessed outcomes, participants primarily focused on simple information presentations, with intuitive organisational decisions and colour coding. Feedback ultimately resulted in two presentation versions, each preferred by a substantial group of participants, and development of a legend to facilitate interpretation. Conclusion Iterative design validation facilitated the development of two novel formats for presenting minimally or partially contextualised NMA results for multiple outcomes. These presentation approaches appeal to audiences that include clinicians with limited familiarity with NMAs.

References Powered by Scopus

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

24102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization

6911Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: An overview and tutorial

2758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exercise for sarcopenia in older people: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monoclonal Antibody for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillips, M. R., Sadeghirad, B., Busse, J. W., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Cuello-Garcia, C. A., Kenji Nampo, F., … Guyatt, G. H. (2022). Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ Open, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

63%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free