Why have so many intravascular glucose monitoring devices failed?

9Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Secondary to the inherent limitations of both point-of-care and central laboratory glucose technologies, continuous glucose measurement has recently enjoyed a high level of investment. Because of the perceived advantages by some of measuring in the intravascular space compared to the subcutaneous tissue, a number of technologies have been developed. In this review, we evaluate nine systems that have shown promise, although only one of these has been cleared for sale in the United States. The detection methodology, regulatory status, technical issues, and company circumstance surrounding each technology are examined.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J. L., & Rice, M. J. (2015). Why have so many intravascular glucose monitoring devices failed? Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 9(4), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815587013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free