Designing in-vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension?

10Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper discusses the design and evaluation of connected and cooperative vehicle in-vehicle sign designs displayed on a mobile phone: Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL), Emergency Vehicle Warning (EVW), Traffic Condition Warning, and Road Works Warning. Appropriateness and comprehension of each design alternative were assessed using quantitative (i.e. Likert scales) and qualitative (i.e. open-ended questions) methods. Forty-four participants took part in the study and were shown twelve dashboard camera videos presenting a total of eleven designs alternatives, displayed with or without a legend. Despite their appropriateness, EEBL and EVW signs displayed with a legend were better comprehended and less ambiguous than those displayed without a legend. Moreover, displaying a legend below the signs to warn drivers of an emergency braking ahead was efficient in low visibility condition and could potentially increase safety in critical situations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Payre, W., & Diels, C. (2019). Designing in-vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension? Applied Ergonomics, 80, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free