Comparison of BIOGRAM and commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test systems

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The BIOGRAM (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) system, which is designed to calculate MICs from disk diffusion zone diameters, was compared with two commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility systems. A total of 111 clinical isolates were evaluated with each test system. Six additional isolates were tested in a comparison between BIOGRAM and Sceptor (Johnston Laboratories, Inc. Towson, Md.) systems. BIOGRAM demonstrated an overall correlation with the Sceptor microdilution method of 95.7% for 1,287 organism-antimicrobial susceptibility combinations. The BIOGRAM and UniScept (Analytab Products, Inc., Plainview, N.Y.) systems were in agreement in 90.3% of 1,048 organism-antimicrobial susceptibility combinations tested. All methicillin-resistant staphylococci were detected by the standard disk agar diffusion method used with the BIOGRAM system. The BIOGRAM system provides an acceptable alternative to these commercial systems for the determination of quantitative susceptibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sautter, R. L., & Denys, G. A. (1987). Comparison of BIOGRAM and commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test systems. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 25(2), 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.25.2.301-304.1987

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free