Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora

5Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The core question behind this Frontiers research topic is whether explaining linguistic phenomena requires appeal to properties of human cognition that are specialized to language. We argue here that investigating this issue requires taking linguistic research results seriously, and evaluating these for domain-specificity. We present a particular empirical phenomenon, bound variable interpretations of pronouns dependent on a quantifier phrase, and argue for a particular theory of this empirical domain that is couched at a level of theoretical depth which allows its principles to be evaluated for domain-specialization. We argue that the relevant principles are specialized when they apply in the domain of language, even if analogs of them are plausibly at work elsewhere in cognition or the natural world more generally. So certain principles may be specialized to language, though not, ultimately, unique to it. Such specialization is underpinned by ultimately biological factors, hence part of UG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adger, D., & Svenonius, P. (2015). Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01421

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free