Background: High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is a useful tool in defining anatomic and dynamic soft tissue relationships in the periocular area. It also allows visualization of hyaluronic acid (HA) gel within the soft tissue. Objectives: The authors investigate the difference in the distribution pattern between 2 HA fillers in the periocular tissue using HRUS. Methods: The charts of 10 patients who underwent periocular injection using HA gel filler and were subsequently examined with HRUS were reviewed. Half of the patients (n = 5) were treated with Restylane-L (Medicis Aesthetics, Inc, Scottsdale, Arizona) and the remaining 5 with Belotero Balance (Merz Aesthetics, Inc, San Mateo, California). Ultrasonographic evaluation (Logiq p6; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Washington) was performed before and immediately after HA filler injection. Results: The HA appears as a hypoechoic image within the soft tissue plane on HRUS. Restylane-L filler formed a localized hypoechoic image within the tissue, with some spread into bubbles or pearl-like configuration. Belotero Balance spread more widely into the tissue plane and diffused into an elongated or spindle-shaped hypoechoic image. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that HA gel fillers with differing production technologies show distinct spread and distribution patterns in the periocular tissues on HRUS examination. © 2014 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Goh, A. S., Kohn, J. C., Rootman, D. B., Lin, J. L., & Goldberg, R. A. (2014). Hyaluronic acid gel distribution pattern in periocular area with high-resolution ultrasound imaging. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 34(4), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14528206
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.