MOOCs in higher education magazines: A content analysis of internal stakeholder perspectives

5Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Higher Education magazines have echoed the rapid spread of MOOCs in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) since 2012. In their pages, MOOC related articles are proliferating. The focus of such articles has often been the disruptive nature as well as the survival of this new form of open online education, especially the first years. However, there is also a great deal of mentions of how internal stakeholders in HEIs perceive the advent of MOOCs. These perceptions are the object of analysis in this article. Using the Content Analysis (CA) method, MOOC related sources in three Higher Education magazines during 2014 have been analysed against a set of key themes. These themes have been established by combining data from two previous studies: a Content Analysis of MOOC related academic literature, and a set of interviews to internal stakeholders using grounded theory. As the findings indicate, in 2014 the main concerns of internal stakeholders have been the new teaching practices and new work dynamics resulting from the incorporation of MOOCs in their working routines. It is argued that educational media no longer focuses on the debate of the future of MOOCs. Rather, the debate is on how MOOCs should be best implemented from a practitioner’s perspective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urrutia, M. L., White, S., & White, S. (2016). MOOCs in higher education magazines: A content analysis of internal stakeholder perspectives. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 583, pp. 395–405). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free