Incubator-based active noise control device: comparison to ear covers and noise reduction zone quantification

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Noise exposure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is consistently higher than current recommendations. This may adversely affect neonatal sleep, weight gain, and overall health. We sought to evaluate the effect of a novel active noise control (ANC) system. Methods: An ANC device’s noise reduction performance was compared to that of adhesively affixed foam ear covers in response to alarm and voice sounds in a simulated NICU environment. The zone of noise reduction of the ANC device was quantified with the same set of alarm and voice sounds. Results: The ANC device provided greater noise reduction than the ear covers in seven of the eight sound sequences tested in which a noise reduction greater than the just noticeable difference was achieved. For noise in the 500 Hz octave band, the ANC device exhibited consistent noise reduction throughout expected patient positions. It provided better performance for noise below 1000 Hz than above 1000 Hz. Conclusions: The ANC device provided generally superior noise reduction to the ear covers and provided a zone of noise reduction throughout the range where an infant would be placed within an incubator. Implications for patient sleep and weight gain are discussed. Impact: Active noise control device can effectively reduce noise inside an infant incubator due to bedside device alarms.This is the first analysis of an incubator-based active noise control device and comparison to adhesively affixed silicone ear covers.A non-contact noise reduction device may be an appropriate means of reducing noise exposure of the hospitalized preterm infant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutchinson, G. M., Wilson, P. S., Sommerfeldt, S., & Ahmad, K. (2023). Incubator-based active noise control device: comparison to ear covers and noise reduction zone quantification. Pediatric Research, 94(5), 1817–1823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02708-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free