In this chapter, I question the Gricean notion of ‘what is said’. I give an outline of arguments supporting the thesis that there are more pragmatic elements of the ‘what is said’ notion than just disambiguation and reference assignments. These additional elements are referred to as ‘pragmatic enrichments’ by neo-Griceans and are distinguished by them from conversational implicatures. I argue that such pragmatic enrichments are subject to the same strategic framework as strong pragmatic effects such as conversational implicatures.
CITATION STYLE
Skoczeń, I. (2019). Propositionalism and the Law. In Law and Philosophy Library (Vol. 127, pp. 89–119). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12532-5_4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.