Nutritional composition and in vitro digestibility of grass and legume winter (cover) crops

23Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In dairy farming systems, growing winter crops for forage is frequently limited to annual grasses grown in monoculture. The objectives of this study were to determine how cropping grasses alone or in mixtures with legumes affects the yield, nutritional composition, and in vitro digestibility of fresh and ensiled winter crops and the yield, nutritional composition, and in vitro digestibility of the subsequent summer crops. Experimental plots were planted with 15 different winter crops at 3 locations in Virginia. At each site, 4 plots of each treatment were planted in a randomized complete block design. The 15 treatments included 5 winter annual grasses [barley (BA), ryegrass (RG), rye (RY), triticale (TR), and wheat (WT)] in monoculture [i.e., no legumes (NO)] or with 1 of 2 winter annual legumes [crimson clover (CC) and hairy vetch (HV)]. After harvesting the winter crops, corn and forage sorghum were planted within the same plots perpendicular to the winter crop plantings. The nutritional composition and the in vitro digestibility of winter and summer crops were determined for fresh and ensiled samples. Growing grasses in mixtures with CC increased forage dry matter (DM) yield (2.84 Mg/ha), but the yield of mixtures with HV (2.47 Mg/ha) was similar to that of grasses grown in monoculture (2.40 Mg/ha). Growing grasses in mixtures with legumes increased the crude protein concentration of the fresh forage from 13.0% to 15.5% for CC and to 17.3% for HV. For neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations, the interaction between grasses and legumes was significant for both fresh and ensiled forages. Growing BA, RY, and TR in mixtures with legumes decreased NDF concentrations, whereas growing RG and WT with legumes did not affect the NDF concentrations of either the fresh or the ensiled forages. Growing grasses in mixtures with legumes decreased the concentration of sugars of fresh forages relative to grasses grown in monoculture. Primarily, this decrease can be attributed to low concentrations of sugars of mixtures with HV (10.5%). Growing grasses in mixtures with legumes reduced the fiber digestibility of both winter crops (75.7% to 72.8% NDF). Growing grasses in mixtures with legumes did not affect estimated DM yield, nutritional composition, or digestibility of the succeeding summer crops. In conclusion, growing grasses in mixtures with legumes as winter forage crops can increase forage estimated DM yields and its nutritional quality in dairy farming sytems.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Desirable Plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides

598Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cover crops and living mulches

569Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determination of starch, including maltooligosaccharides, in animal feeds: Comparison of methods and a method recommended for AOAC collaborative study

495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of alfalfa and alfalfa-grass mixtures with nitrogen fertilization on dry matter yield and forage nutritive value

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Reducing the Content of Harmful Fungi and Mycotoxins on the Quality of Mixed Fermented Feed

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determination dry matter digestibility of tropical forage using nutrient compisition

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, A. N., Ferreira, G., Teets, C. L., Thomason, W. E., & Teutsch, C. D. (2018). Nutritional composition and in vitro digestibility of grass and legume winter (cover) crops. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(3), 2037–2047. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13260

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Researcher 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26

76%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

9%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 3

9%

Chemical Engineering 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0