The Akedah and the Oedipus Myth

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter deals with the ethic of inner retreat in light of the biblical myth dealing with the akedah (the binding of Isaac). Ostensibly, this text reflects a worldview antithetical to the ethic of inner retreat. The akedah story empowers the active subject, as sovereignty attempts to do, but is far more drastic in that it is concretized in the negation of the other’s very existence. Moreover, it comes forth in the unique relationship between father and son. Contrary to this accepted view, I claim that the akedah myth is one of the earliest expressions of the ethic of inner retreat. In its role as a text constituting culture, this myth illustrates the stages of the course the individual must pass through—from exaggerated self-empowerment as subject up to a retreat enabling the other, in this case the son, to be present. The myth is not an ethical theory and its language is thus descriptive rather than articulated in philosophical terms. The interpreter’s role is thus to rescue the theoretical position from its implicit formulation in the story.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sagi, A. (2018). The Akedah and the Oedipus Myth. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 99, pp. 101–124). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99178-8_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free