Fraudulent Financial Statement: Evidence from Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99

  • Suyanto S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
228Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The goals of this study are to empirically identify fraud risk factors and construct a model to predict the likelihood of financial statement frauds based on SAS No. 99. Employing logistic regression on 143 firms, this research  finds that fraud risk factor proxies for Pressure—net profit/total assets—and Opportunity— inventory/total assets ratio, related party transactions, and Big 4—are significantly associated with fraudulent financial statements, whereas none of the fraud risk factor proxies for Rationalization is significantly associated with fraudulent financial statements. Consistent with prior research, it seems that the likelihood of fraudulent financial statements is easier to be observed publicly using fraud risk factor proxies for Pressure and Opportunity rather than Rationalization. The constructed model can correctly classify firms with a relatively high success rate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suyanto, S. (2009). Fraudulent Financial Statement: Evidence from Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 11(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free