This paper describes a comprehensive assessment of a new high-resolution, gauge-satellite-based analysis of daily precipitation over continental South America during 2004. This methodology is based on a combination of additive and multiplicative bias correction schemes to get the lowest bias when compared with the observed values (rain gauges). Intercomparisons and cross-validation tests have been carried out between independent rain gauges and different merging techniques. This validation process was done for the control algorithm [Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis real-time algorithm] and five different merging schemes: additive bias correction; ratio bias correction; TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis, research version; and the combined scheme proposed in this paper. These methodologies were tested for different months belonging to different seasons and for different network densities. All compared, merging schemes produce better results than the control algorithm; however, when finer temporal (daily) and spatial scale (regional networks) gauge datasets are included in the analysis, the improvement is remarkable. The combined scheme consistently presents the best performance among the five techniques tested in this paper. This is also true when a degraded daily gauge network is used instead of a full dataset. This technique appears to be a suitable tool to produce real-time, high-resolution, gauge- and satellite-based analyses of daily precipitation over land in regional domains. © 2009 American Meteorological Society.
CITATION STYLE
Vila, D. A., de Goncalves, L. G. G., Toll, D. L., & Rozante, J. R. (2009). Statistical evaluation of combined daily gauge observations and rainfall satellite estimates over continental South America. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 10(2), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1048.1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.