Comparison of the performance of seven classifiers as effective decision support tools for the cytodiagnosis of breast cancer: A case study

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We evaluate the performance of seven classifiers as effective potential decision support tools in the cytodiagnosis of breast cancer. To this end, we use a real-world database containing 692 fine needle aspiration of the breast lesion cases collected by a single observer. The results show, in average, good overall classification performance in terms of five different tests: accuracy of 93.62%, sensitivity of 89.37%, specificity of 96%, PV+ of 92% and PV- of 94.5%. With this comparison, we identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches. Finally, based on these results, we give some advice regarding the selection on the classifier depending on the user's needs. © 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cruz-Ramírez, N., Acosta-Mesa, H. G., Carrillo-Calvet, H., & Barrientos-Martínez, R. E. (2007). Comparison of the performance of seven classifiers as effective decision support tools for the cytodiagnosis of breast cancer: A case study. Advances in Soft Computing, 41, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72432-2_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free