Bi-directional in sustainability reporting and profitability: A study in Indonesian banks and non-banks

  • Gunarsih T
  • Setiyono S
  • Sayekti F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigate the sustainability reporting differences in banks and non-banks sample firms and investigates reserve causality between sustainability reporting and profitability. The independent-sample t-test implemented to analyze the differences. The results report evidence that there are differences in sustainability reporting between the banks and non-bank. The average score of the sustainability reporting index in banks is higher than non-bank. The multiple regressions implemented in reserve causality between sustainability reporting and profitability. The empirical evidence shows that there is a negative relationship between sustainability reporting and profitability. We suggest that sustainability is merely a cost. The bi-directional relationship emerges in the economic and social dimension of sustainability reporting index. This result indicates that sustainability reporting influences firm performance and vice versa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gunarsih, T., Setiyono, S., Sayekti, F., & Novak, T. (2020). Bi-directional in sustainability reporting and profitability: A study in Indonesian banks and non-banks. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v24i1.3588

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free