Using hypernymy acquisition to tackle (part of) textual entailment

5Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Within the task of Recognizing Textual Entailment, various existing work has proposed the idea that tackling specific subtypes of entailment could be more productive than taking a generic approach to entailment. In this paper we look at one such subtype, where the entailment involves hypernymy relations, often found in Question Answering tasks. We investigate current work on hypernymy acquisition, and show that adapting one such approach leads to a marked improvement in entailment classification accuracy.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60504Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge

1177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence

368Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Experiments with three approaches to recognizing lexical entailment

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experiments with three approaches to recognizing lexical entailment

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing the Reasoning Power for NLI Models with Annotated Multi-perspective Entailment Dataset

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akhmatova, E., & Dras, M. (2009). Using hypernymy acquisition to tackle (part of) textual entailment. In TextInfer 2009 - 2009 Workshop on Applied Textual Inference at the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, ACL-IJCNLP 2009 - Proceedings (pp. 52–60). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1708141.1708152

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

69%

Researcher 6

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 29

76%

Linguistics 7

18%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Social Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free