Rats counting rats: The use of conspecifics as discriminative stimuli

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although a variety of experimental procedures have shown considerable evidence of “counting” in animals, there is no evidence of numerical competence when conspecifics are used as test stimuli. Here, we report evidence of a relative numerousness (2 vs. 4) judgment by rats that were required to discriminate the number of free-ranging conspecifics in an arena. This discrimination was ultimately disrupted by vigorous social interaction between the subjects and the to-be-counted rats. Attempts to restrict the movement of object rats in Experiment 2 did not lead to reestablishment of the discrimination, although 2 animals did show evidence of a simple presence versus absence (0 vs. 5) discrimination, a precursor of numerical ability. © 1992, Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davis, H., & Hiestand, L. (1992). Rats counting rats: The use of conspecifics as discriminative stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(5), 356–358. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334087

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free