NICE v. SIGN on psychosis and schizophrenia: Same roots, similar guidelines, different interpretations

7Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A recent editorial claimed that the 2014 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline on psychosis and schizophrenia, unlike its equivalent 2013 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline, is biased towards psychosocial treatments and against drug treatments. In this paper we underline that the NICE and SIGN guidelines recommend similar interventions, but that the NICE guideline has more rigorous methodology. Our analysis suggests that the authors of the editorial appear to have succumbed to bias themselves.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kendall, T., Whittington, C. J., Kuipers, E., Johnson, S., Birchwood, M. J., Marshall, M., & Morrison, A. P. (2016). NICE v. SIGN on psychosis and schizophrenia: Same roots, similar guidelines, different interpretations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 208(4), 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.170324

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free