Human-wildlife contact and emerging infectious diseases

12Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The majority of all emerging pathogens in humans are zoonotic (nonhuman animal) in origin. Population, ecological, and behavioral changes that increase contact with wildlife exacerbate emergence of these pathogens. Anthropogenic modification of the physical environment has altered not only our risk of zoonotic infection from wildlife but also the likelihood of pathogen transmission from human to nonhuman animal populations. This is particularly the case for primates that share a number of common infections with humans. In this chapter, I use a series of case studies involving SARS, HIV, Nipah virus, Lyme disease, malaria, and Ebola to exemplify how various anthropogenic factors have facilitated pathogen transmission between human and nonhuman animal populations. The costs and benefits of primate-based ecotourism are also reviewed to better illustrate how human-wildlife contact can affect both populations. Responsible health monitoring of human-wildlife interactions is a necessary prerequisite for prevention of the transmission of future emerging infectious diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muehlenbein, M. P. (2013). Human-wildlife contact and emerging infectious diseases. In Human-Environment Interactions: Current and Future Directions (pp. 79–94). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4780-7_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free