Comparing Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Baseline HbA1cLevels

Abstract

Importance: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy has been associated with cardiovascular benefits and a few adverse events; however, whether the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles vary with differences in baseline hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) levels is unknown. Objective: To compare cardiovascular effectiveness and safety of treatment with SGLT2i vs dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (1) overall and (2) at varying baseline HbA1clevels. Design, Setting, and Participants: A new-user comparative effectiveness and safety research study was conducted among 144614 commercially insured adults, initiating treatment with SGLT2i or DPP-4i and with a recorded T2D diagnosis at baseline and at least 1 HbA1claboratory result recorded within 3 months before treatment initiation. Interventions: The intervention consisted of the initiation of treatment with SGLT2i or DPP-4i. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause death (modified major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Safety outcomes were hypovolemia, fractures, falls, genital infections, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), acute kidney injury (AKI), and lower-limb amputation. Incidence rate (IR) per 1000 person-years, hazard ratios (HR) and rate differences (RD) with their 95% CIs were estimated controlling for 128 covariates. Results: A total of 144614 eligible adults (mean [SD] age, 62 [12.4] years; 54% male participants) with T2D initiating treatment with a SGLT2i (n = 60523) or a DPP-4i (n = 84091) were identified; 44099 had an HbA1cbaseline value of less than 7.5%, 52986 between 7.5% and 9%, and 47529 greater than 9%. Overall, 87274 eligible patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched: 24052 with HbA1cless than 7.5%; 32290 with HbA1cbetween 7.5% and 9%; and 30932 with HbA1cgreater than 9% (to convert percentage of total hemoglobin to proportion of total hemoglobin, multiply by 0.01). The initiation of SGLT2i vs DPP-4i was associated with a reduction in the risk of modified MACE (IR per 1000 person-years 17.13 vs 20.18, respectively; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; RD, -3.02; 95% CI, -5.23 to -0.80) and HHF (IR per 1000 person-years 3.68 vs 8.08, respectively; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.57; RD -4.37; 95% CI, -5.62 to -3.12) over a mean follow-up of 8 months, with no evidence of treatment effect heterogeneity across the HbA1clevels. Treatment with SGLT2i showed an increased risk of genital infections and DKA and a reduced AKI risk compared with DPP-4i. Findings were consistent by HbA1clevels, except for a more pronounced risk of genital infections associated with SGLT2i for HbA1clevels of 7.5% to 9% (IR per 1000 person-years 68.5 vs 22.8, respectively; HR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.68-3.58; RD, 46.22; 95% CI, 40.54-51.90). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness and safety research study among adults with T2D, SGLT2i vs DPP-4i treatment initiators had a reduced risk of modified MACE and HHF, an increased risk of genital infections and DKA, and a lower risk of AKI, regardless of baseline HbA1c..