Measuring by Numbers: Bibliometric Evaluation of Faculty’s Research Outputsand Impact on Academic Life in China

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Quantification and audit have become management tools worldwide. Since the 1990s, along with Projects 211 and 985 and the professional transformation of university teachers, bibliometric evaluation has become an important means to assess the research performance of university teachers in China. On the basis of analyzing key policy documents in different periods and bibliometric data from a Project 985 university, this study illustrates the historical construction of bibliometric evaluation as a legitimate evaluation method. The impact of quantitative assessment on the academic life of university teachers, such as decisions on where and how to publish, professionalization of academic work, ritualism in the production of knowledge, and increase in the workload of faculty members, are also analyzed on the basis of interviews with more than 36 teachers and administrators in eight universities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen, W., Mao, D., & Lin, Y. (2021). Measuring by Numbers: Bibliometric Evaluation of Faculty’s Research Outputsand Impact on Academic Life in China. In Measuring Up in Higher Education: How University Rankings and League Tables are Re-shaping Knowledge Production in the Global Era (pp. 203–227). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7921-9_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free