Evaluation of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Vulvovestibular Syndrome

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Vulvovestibular syndrome (VVS) or vulvodynia is a chronic, heterogeneous and multifactorial disease that dramatically affects women’s health and quality of life. Despite important advancements in understanding VVS etiology have been achieved in the past decades, VVS still remains an elusive and complex condition without identifiable causes and effective treatments. In the present observational, retrospective, case-control study, we sought to investigate whether gut dysbiosis developed in patients with VVS. Methods: To this aim, we compared both bacterial and fungal composition in VVS patients (n = 74; 34.3 ± 10.9 years old) with those of women without gynecological symptoms (n = 13 healthy control; 38.3 ± 10.4 years old). Furthermore, to assess whether gut ecology may have an impact on gut function, the degree of intestinal inflammation (calprotectin levels) and gut permeability (zonulin levels) were also evaluated. Results: VVS patient developed gut dysbiosis, mainly characterized by a significant increase of Escherichia coli along with increased colonization of mold/yeast compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, fecal levels of zonulin indicated that in VVS patients gut dysbiosis translated into increased gut permeability. Conclusion: Our preliminary study, by demonstrating that alterations in gut microbiota and intestinal permeability are present in patients with VVS, highlights the novel notion that gut dysbiosis may be considered an important associated factor for VVS. These findings, if confirmed, may be clinically relevant and may help in choosing further diagnostic methods and more effective therapies for these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coda, L., Cassis, P., Angioletti, S., Angeloni, C., Piloni, S., & Testa, C. (2021). Evaluation of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Vulvovestibular Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 13(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free