Testing Allsop and West's size at sex change invariant within a fish species: A spurious ratio or a useful group descriptor?

10Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that sequential hermaphrodites, from a variety of taxa and a wide range of sizes, change sex at the same relative size. It is said that there exists an invariant (a constant ratio) for such a life trait. However, recent criticisms point out that these results could be a statistical artefact. It has been argued that the wider the range of x-axis values (from 2 mm to 1.5 m in the case of sex change), the higher the probability of identifying an invariant by chance. Here, the invariance of the size at sex change ratio is analysed within a single fish species for which the size of sex change varies within a range of only 6.5 cm. Our results support the invariant rule that fishes change sex when reaching 79% of their maximum size. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linde, M., & Palmer, M. (2008). Testing Allsop and West’s size at sex change invariant within a fish species: A spurious ratio or a useful group descriptor? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(3), 914–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01508.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free