The Platformization of Public Participation: Considerations for Urban Planners Navigating New Engagement Tools

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Professional urban planners have an ethical obligation to work in the public interest. Public input and critique gathered at public meetings and other channels are used to inform planning recommendations to elected officials. Pre-pandemic, the planning profession worked with digital tools, but in-person meetings were the dominant form of public participation. The pandemic imposed a shift to digital channels and tools, with the result that planners’ use of technology risks unitizing public participation. As the use of new platforms for public participation expands, we argue it has the potential to fundamentally change participation, a process we call platformization. We frame this as a subset of the broader emergence of platform urbanism. This chapter evaluates six public participation platforms, identifying how the tools they provide map onto key participation frameworks from Arnstein (1969), Fung (2006), and IAP2 (2018). Through this analysis, we examine how the platformization of public participation poses ethical and scholarly challenges to the work of professional planners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, P., & Johnson, P. (2023). The Platformization of Public Participation: Considerations for Urban Planners Navigating New Engagement Tools. In Urban Book Series (Vol. Part F270, pp. 71–87). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31746-0_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free