The association of chronic endometritis with mid-trimester loss due to cervical incompetence and the outcome of laparoscopic cervical cerclage

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association of chronic endometritis (CE) with cervical incompetence (CI) in Chinese women with mid-trimester loss, and the impact of the presence of CE on the outcome of laparoscopic cervical cerclage (LCC). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included a study group of 293 women with mid-trimester loss due to CI (group I) and a comparison group of 332 women with recurrent first-trimester miscarriage (group II). Immunohistochemical study using CD138 epitope for the diagnosis of CE was completed in all subjects. Pre-conception LCC was undertaken in 247 women in the study group (group I). The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) (number 2015FXHEC-KY005). Results: The prevalence of CE in group I was 42%, significantly (P < 0.001) higher than that of 23.5% in group II. Among 247 women in group I, there were no significant difference in mid-trimester loss rate, preterm delivery rate and term delivery rate in women with and without CE (2.2, 12.0, 85.8% vs. 1.8, 10.1, 88.1% respectively) and between women with CE treated and not treated with antibiotics prior to conception (2.3, 9.3, 88.4% vs. 2.0, 14.3, 83.7% respectively). Conclusions: Mid-trimester loss due to cervical incompetence is associated with chronic endometritis; However, the presence or not of CE and whether it was treated with antibiotics prior to conception did not appear to significantly influence the obstetric outcomes of women with CI after LCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., Song, D., Feng, X., Huang, X., Xia, E., & Li, T. (2021). The association of chronic endometritis with mid-trimester loss due to cervical incompetence and the outcome of laparoscopic cervical cerclage. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 304(5), 1345–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06029-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free