Do Time and Language Matter in IR? : Nishida Kitaro’s non-Western discourse of philosophy and politics

  • Shimizu K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Kyoto School of philosophy has recently come to be seen as one of the sourc- es that gave rise to non-Western international relations (IR). Despite the high re- gard with which this philosophy is held, there is a dark side to the School’s history; this is especially important in terms of critically engaging in IR as an academic discipline because it supposedly provides a cautionary tale to the contemporary literature of alternative IR theories, and non-Western IRT in particular. This paper strives to clarify Nishida Kitaro’s involvement in the wartime regime with a partic- ular focus on the inherent and contradictory relationship between being and lan- guage. I will do so by critically investigating Nishida’s experience of involvement in the wartime regime by utilising his very concept of the eternal present. In other words, I will criticise Nishida’s politics by employing his philosophy

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shimizu, K. (2018). Do Time and Language Matter in IR? : Nishida Kitaro’s non-Western discourse of philosophy and politics. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 16(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2018.04.16.1.99

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free