Critical theory

0Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Apparently—and in spite of manifold similarities in substance and purpose—the Frankfurt School had little direct influence on leading contributors to “La Pensée 68” in France. But, in the Anglophone context, the works of Adorno and Horkheimer, Marcuse and Fromm were stuffed into the backpacks of the young intellectuals who were shaping the political and counter-cultural movements of the 1960s. When the time came for them to embrace French theory and academic postmodernism more generally, they facilitated a merger that contributed to the disruption of established disciplines in the humanities across the board. This chapter focuses on the life and work of Theodor Adorno, but selectively; once again, the aim is to provide enough understanding of what “Critical Theory” originally was so that its eventual influence in the Anglophone context on, say, cultural studies can be justly assessed. This much is clear: of all the forms of “neo-Marxism” that survived the realization that the “superstructure” of culture had a historical efficacy of its own, critical theory as conceived by the Frankfurt School was the most influential and productive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Zengotita, T. (2018). Critical theory. In Political Philosophy and Public Purpose (pp. 127–136). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90689-8_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free