Proportions, characters and chronologies: Their contribution to systematic paleontology. A rebuttal to Furió and Pons-Monjo

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The comment by Furió and Pons-Monjo is an attempt to invalidate the new species Nesiotites rafelinensis recently described by Rofes et al. and to place it in synonymy with N. ponsi or a closely related form (N. aff. ponsi and/or N. cf. ponsi). Through detailed argumentation, the use of proportions instead of lengths, the re-analysis of the characters questioned by Furió and Pons-Monjo, and the consideration of the chronology and the evolution of ecological communities, we rebut Furió and Pons Monjo's conclusions and confirm the status of N. rafelinensis as a valid and distinct species represented by the specimen of Caló den Rafelino (Mallorca, Spain).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rofes, J., Bover, P., Cuenca-Bescós, G., & Alcover, J. A. (2013). Proportions, characters and chronologies: Their contribution to systematic paleontology. A rebuttal to Furió and Pons-Monjo. Palaeontologia Electronica, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.26879/412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free